Garcia

(PC) York v. Garcia

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20191:15-cv-01828California1,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD RAY YORK, No. 1:15-cv-01828-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

G.GARCIA, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

16 (Doc. No. 64, 69, 78 ) 17 18 Plaintiff Reginald Ray York is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 27, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and that the cross-motion for summary judgment brought on behalf of defendants Garcia and Neighbors be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. No. 78.) Specifically, the findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.