Clark-Barlow

(PC) Renfro v. Clark-Barlow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20192:15-cv-00632California4,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAY RICHARD RENFRO, No. 2:15-cv-0632 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND LISA CLARK-BARLOW, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter proceeds against a single defendant, Family Nurse Practitioner (“FNP”) Lisa Clark-Barlow, on an Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim. Defendant now moves for summary judgment, and plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a tardy motion for summary judgment. Because the Court finds that there is no dispute of material fact as to whether defendant violated plaintiff’s rights, the undersigned will recommend that defendant’s motion be granted. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a tardy summary judgment motion will be denied. //// //// 28 I. Plaintiff’s Allegations In 1998 (prior to incarceration), plaintiff was diagnosed as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.