Puentes

(HC) Ioane v. Puentes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20191:19-cv-00998California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL S. IOANE, SR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00998-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS

GEORGINA PUENTES, (ECF No. 7) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Michael S. Ioane, Sr. is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 7). In order to proceed in court without prepayment of the filing fee, Petitioner must submit an affidavit demonstrating that he “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Although there is no set formula to determine whether a certain income level meets the poverty threshold under § 1915(a)(1), courts have looked to the federal poverty guidelines developed each year by the Department of Health and Human Services. See Lint v. City of Boise, No. CV09-72-S-EJL, 2009 WL 1149442, at *2 (D. Idaho Apr. 28, 2009); Johnson v. Leohane, No. Civ. 08-00432-ACK-KSC, 2008 WL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.