Foulk

(PC) Burton v. Foulk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20192:13-cv-02123California8,547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARRISON BURTON, No. 2:13-cv-2123 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

F. FOULK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants interfered with his access to the courts, retaliated against him, and used excessive force in violation of his constitutional rights. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend defendants’ motion be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND I. Allegations in the SAC This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed here on October 2, 2015. (ECF No. 15.) His allegations involve conduct that occurred in 2011, 2012, and 2013 when he was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”). ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.