D'Agostini

(HC) Castillo v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20192:19-cv-01626California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARDO CASTILLO, No. 2:19-cv-1626 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND JOHN D’AGOSTINI, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, an El Dorado County Jail pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Examination of the request to proceed in forma pauperis reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. Petitioner complains about ongoing criminal proceedings in El Dorado…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.