(HC) Glover v. CDCR At CHCF
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID GLOVER, No. 2:18-cv-02816-DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND CDCR AT CHCF, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, a district court may summarily dismiss a § 2254 petition before the respondent files an answer “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” At issue in this case is petitioner’s pursuit of the removal of an erroneous “R suffix” that was placed in his Central…