Orozco

(PC) Howze v. Orozco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20192:16-cv-01738California3,734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.L. HOWZE, No. 2:16-cv-1738 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A.B. OROZCO, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is defendants Grout, Neuschmid, and Orozco’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24), which has been joined by defendant Sahota (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 30. I. Procedural History By order and findings and recommendations filed September 17, 2018, the undersigned screened the first amended complaint and found that plaintiff had stated claims for relief against defendants Grout, Neuschmid, Orozco, and Sahota for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, conspiracy, and violation of his rights under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). ECF No. 14 at 10. It was further recommended that plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.