Arellano

Arellano v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20191:17-cv-01235California2,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK ARELLANO, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01235 - LJO-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION ) TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY (Doc. 34) v. ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CHAD HASKINS, et al., ) AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 33) ) Defendants. ) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 35)

Erik Arellano asserts Bakersfield Police Officers Chad Haskins and Frederick Martinez used excessive force after he surrendered to their arrest. (Doc. 9) Defendants report Plaintiff failed to provide proper responses to their interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants seek to compel Plaintiff to provide further discovery responses. (Doc. 34-2) Plaintiff sought an extension of time to supplement his responses (Doc. 33) but did not otherwise oppose the motion. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.