Mohamed
Mohamed v. Pompeo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 NASSR ABDULLA MOHAMED; MUHJAH 1:19-cv-01345-LJO-SKO ABDOALNASAR MOHAMMED AHMED;
MAZEN ABULSQADER THABIT AL-AREQI; MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
A.A., G.A., and A.A.(2); ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF
Plaintiffs, MANDAMUS AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF No. 2) v.
MICHAEL POMPEO, et al.,
Defendants. 11 On September 25, 2019, Plaintiffs Nassr Abdulla Mohamed (“Mohamed”), Muhjah Abdoalnasar 13 Mohammed Ahmed (“Muhjah”), Mazen Abulsqader Thabit Al-Areqi (“Mazen”), and Plaintiffs 14 Muhjah’s and Mazen’s three minor children, A.A., G.A., and A.A.(2), (“Minor Plaintiffs”), filed this 15 action against Defendants Michael Pompeo, William Barr, Kevin Mcaleenan, U.S. Department of State, 16 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice, Devin Kennington, and United 17 States Embassy, Djibouti. ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiffs filed a motion for an 18 emergency writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction. ECF No. 2 (“TRO…