Mohamed

Mohamed v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20191:19-cv-01345California2,570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 NASSR ABDULLA MOHAMED; MUHJAH 1:19-cv-01345-LJO-SKO ABDOALNASAR MOHAMMED AHMED;

MAZEN ABULSQADER THABIT AL-AREQI; MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

A.A., G.A., and A.A.(2); ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF

Plaintiffs, MANDAMUS AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (ECF No. 2) v.

MICHAEL POMPEO, et al.,

Defendants. 11 On September 25, 2019, Plaintiffs Nassr Abdulla Mohamed (“Mohamed”), Muhjah Abdoalnasar 13 Mohammed Ahmed (“Muhjah”), Mazen Abulsqader Thabit Al-Areqi (“Mazen”), and Plaintiffs 14 Muhjah’s and Mazen’s three minor children, A.A., G.A., and A.A.(2), (“Minor Plaintiffs”), filed this 15 action against Defendants Michael Pompeo, William Barr, Kevin Mcaleenan, U.S. Department of State, 16 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Justice, Devin Kennington, and United 17 States Embassy, Djibouti. ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiffs filed a motion for an 18 emergency writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction. ECF No. 2 (“TRO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.