(PS) Awadan v. Reebok Corporate Headquarter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20192:17-cv-01148California758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FAIZAL AWADAN, SHAINAZ No. 2: 17-cv-01148-KJM-AC

AWADAN,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.

REEBOK CORPORATE

HEADQUARTER, Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in Solano County Superior Court on April 18, 2017. The claims arise out of an altercation between plaintiffs and several employees at a Reebok store, in which Reebok employees refused to allow plaintiff Shainaz Awadan to return two pairs of shoes, and ultimately kept the shoes without refunding her the purchase price. See generally, Compl., ECF No. 1-2, at 6–7. Plaintiff’s complaint contained claims related to, inter alia, discrimination, civil rights violations, unethical and unfair business practices, and claimed damages of over $70 million. Defendant removed the case on May 31, 2017, on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. See Not. of Removal, ECF No. 1 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)). Defendant then moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims, and, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.