Valencia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COURTNEY JEROME CROSBY, No. 2:18-cv-1848 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 16, 2019, plaintiff dismissed his claims against defendants Nuñez and Aguilar pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Plaintiff did not provide a reason for dismissing those defendants and he was not required to. On August 7, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint. In the motion, plaintiff asserts he seeks to revive claims against Nuñez and Aguilar. Plaintiff asserts that the reason he dismissed Nuñez and Aguilar was because he did not exhaust available administrative remedies with respect to his claims against them prior to filing his complaint. Since he did exhaust administrative remedies with respect to his claims before submitting his 26 …