(SS) Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20191:16-cv-01676California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATTY LYNN MARTIN, ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01676- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S MOTION ) FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO v. ) 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) ) ANDREW M. SAUL1, ) (Doc. 24) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

Young Cho, counsel for Plaintiff Patty Lynn Martin, seeks an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 24) Neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner of Social Security oppose the motion. For the following reasons, the motion for attorney fees is GRANTED. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff entered into a contingent fee agreement with the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing on October 20, 2016. (Doc. 24-1) The agreement entitled counsel to an award of “25% of the backpay awarded” if judicial review of an administrative decision was required, and the adverse decision of an ALJ was reversed. (Id. at 1) The agreement also required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.