Snyder
Snyder v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY SNYDER, MARTIN and BETH No. 1:15-CV-01892-TLN-KJN MELNICK, LIA LOUTHAN, and SUMMERFIELD GARDENS CONDOMINIUM, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, Inc., A Missouri Corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant TAMKO Building Products, Inc’s (“Defendant”) partial Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 68.) Plaintiffs Jeffery Snyder (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”)1, Beth Melnick, Lia Louthan, and Summerfield Gardens Condominium, oppose the motion. (ECF No. 73.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 68) as to Plaintiff Snyder without leave to amend.
25 Plaintiff is the sole California plaintiff named in the proposed nationwide class of entities and individuals who allege their properties were clad in Defendant’s defective shingles. (ECF No. 36 ¶ 1.) Defendant has moved to 26 dismiss all claims…