(SS) Holcomb v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:17-cv-02268California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERALD E. HOLCOMB, No. 2:17-cv-02268-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 On January 11, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF No. 29, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On January 17, 2019, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 30. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and considered plaintiff’s objections, the court finds the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The court adopts the magistrate judge’s ultimate conclusions, with the following clarifications. ///// ///// I. ALJ’S CREDIBILITY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.