Lizzaraga
(HC) Padilla v. Lizzaraga
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILBERTO PADILLA, No. 2:18-cv-02266-TLN-EFB Petitioner, v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 27.) On August 21 and 28, 2019, Petitioner filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations.1 (ECF Nos. 28 & 29.) / / / 26 Petitioner’s second filing of Objections (ECF No. 29) appears to be nothing more than a poor photocopy of his Objections filed August 21, 2019 (ECF No. 28) but is otherwise identical…