Allison

(PC) Lamon v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:18-cv-02218California623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2:18-cv-2218 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). On January 9, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. As to the contents of the amended complaint, plaintiff was instructed he must comply with Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which basically requires that a complaint be “short and plain.” Plaintiff was also informed that he may bring as many claims as he likes against a particular defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 18(a). But, claims brought against other defendants must arise “out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.