Muinoz

(PC) Ramirez v. Muinoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:19-cv-00309California1,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFONSO BOBBY CANTU RAMIREZ, No. 2:19-cv-0309 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

HOPE MUINOZ, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed July 11, 2019, the undersigned screened the second amended complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff has now filed a third amended complaint (ECF No. 33), as well as two more motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 31, 32). I. Third Amended Complaint The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.