Dahlin
Dahlin v. Frieborn
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al., Defendants. 16 By way of this action, Plaintiffs James and Kimberly Dahlin (the “Dahlins”), and Toby and Martina Tippets (the “Tippets,” and collectively with the Dahlins, “Plaintiffs”) assert 11 federal and state causes of action against various municipal and non- municipal Defendants stemming from the seizure of various items and 57 dogs from the Dahlins’ property, where they own and operate a dog breeding business.1 Presently before the Court are three individually briefed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 71, filed by the following groups of Defendants: (1) City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Community Service Officer Debby Nelson, Police Officer Phillip Isetta, Police Officer Angela McCollough, and Police Sergeant Huey Tucker (hereinafter collectively “City…