Levy

Levy v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:18-cv-02387California671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney (SBN 156366) KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 186055) KRogan@cityofsacramento.org CITY OF SACRAMENTO 915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Facsimile: (916) 808-7455

Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 BYRON H. LEVY, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02387-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, S DT ISIP CU OL VA ET RI YO N C UT TO - OC FO FN AT NIN DU E

EXPERT DISCLOSURE DATES;

vs. ORDER

CITY OF SACRAMENTO,

16 Defendant. 17 Pursuant to Rule 16, a party may seek to modify a scheduling order, including modification of a discovery cut-off date “for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).) “good cause” exists when a scheduling deadline “cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” (Schaffner v. Crown Equipment Corporation, 2011 WL 6303408 at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2011) (citing Johnson v. Mammoth Recreation, Inc., 975…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.