(PC) Humes v. Yolo County Probation Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:17-cv-02327California3,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN HUMES, No. 2:17-cv-2327 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

YOLO COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former county and current state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Currently before the court is defendant’s fully briefed motion to dismiss plaintiff’s third amended complaint (ECF No. 31) and plaintiff’s motions for a subpoena (ECF No. 36), to compel discovery (ECF No. 37), and to proceed (ECF No. 39). I. Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff alleges that while on probation in Yolo County, he was required to report in person to his probation officer in Woodland, California. ECF No. 19 at 4. However, during his probation, plaintiff lived in Sacramento and was “gravely 100% disabled by severe brain and spinal damage,” which made it difficult…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.