Calone

Jackson v. Calone

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:16-cv-00891California10,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON, No. 2:16–cv–00891–TLN–KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARD CALONE; CALONE &

HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE

& BEATTIE, LLP; and CALONE LAW

GROUP, LLP,

16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dorothy Jackson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 139), Motion to File a Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 172), Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 179), and Motion to Enforce the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 196). Defendants Richard Calone; Calone & Harrel Law Group, LLP; Calone & Beattie, LLP; and Calone Law Group, LLP (collectively “Defendants”) oppose Plaintiff’s motions. (ECF Nos. 142, 173, 202, 205.) Also before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 193) and Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(b) (ECF No. 194). Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motions. (ECF Nos. 206, 207.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing and for the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.