Sullivan

(PC) Jackson v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20191:07-cv-00178California966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DERWIN JULES JACKSON, Case No. 1:07-cv-00178-DAD-GSA (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. (ECF NO. 151) T.W. MEADORS and J.L. COBBS, 14 Defendants. 15 Derwin Jules Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties reached an oral settlement during the Court-assisted settlement conference on February 8, 2018. (ECF No. 128). The parties expressed an intention to execute a written settlement agreement, however Plaintiff refused to sign the proposed agreement. Defendants moved to enforce the terms of the written settlement agreement, or, in the alternative, the terms as stated on the record consistent with applicable law. (ECF No. 137). On September 14, 2018, the Court ordered that “the terms agreed to orally on the record[] are deemed enforceable and binding as of the date of this order, without any further written agreement.” (ECF No. 145,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.