(SS) Drewry v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20192:18-cv-02241California4,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK C. DREWRY, No. 2:18-cv-2241-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15 & 16. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, the Commissioner’s motion is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I. Background Plaintiff filed an application for a period of disability and DIB, alleging that he had been disabled since January 31, 2014. Administrative Record (“AR”), ECF No. 11, at 212-17.

1 Plaintiff subsequently amended the disability onset date to November 1, 2014. AR 17. Plaintiff’s application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.