Hurley

(PC) Diaz v. Hurley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20192:15-cv-02083California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:15-cv-2083 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On July 24, 2019, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file objections. On August 26, 2019, plaintiff was granted an additional fifteen days in which to file objections. This latest deadline has now passed, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.