Stratton

(PC) Rich v. Stratton

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20192:17-cv-00432California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH RAY RICH, No. 2:17-cv-0432 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

J. STRATTON, et al., Defendants. 16 By order issued June 3, 2019, plaintiff was directed either to file an amended complaint or to inform the court in writing that he did not wish to file an amended complaint and instead wanted to proceed only on the claims the undersigned had found were cognizable in the screening order. (See ECF No. 7 at 10). At that time, plaintiff was given thirty days to comply with the court’s order. (See id. at 10). More than thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.