Leal

Leal v. Vang

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20191:19-cv-01267California2,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE REYMUNDO LEAL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01267-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

MALIA VANG, et al., (ECF No. 5) Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

16 Jose Reymundo Leal (“Plaintiff”), a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed September 26, 2019. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.