Kernan

(PC) Walker v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20192:17-cv-01764California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 G. DANIEL WALKER, No. 2:17-cv-1764 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated August 8, 2019, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was screened. (ECF No. 23.) The court found plaintiff had stated potentially cognizable retaliation claim against defendants Green, Kumar, Muniz, and Martella. The court also found that the complaint did not contain any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was given the option to proceed immediately on his retaliation claims or to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was directed to complete and return a form indicating his decision within fourteen days. He was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those fourteen days have passed, and plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.