(PS) Ramirez v. County of El Dorado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20192:18-cv-00632California2,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM RAMIREZ and STACEY No. 2:18-cv-00632-KJM-CKD PS

RAMIREZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 I. Introduction Before the court is defendants’ motion to modify the pretrial scheduling order. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiffs did not oppose the motion. Defendants’ motion came on regularly for hearing on October 2, 2019. Gökalp Gürer appeared for defendants. Plaintiffs appeared pro se telephonically. Upon review of the documents in support and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: II. Background A. Pretrial Scheduling Order On December 28, 2018, the undersigned issued a scheduling order setting the following relevant deadlines: - September 2, 2019: Non-expert fact discovery deadline. (ECF No. 24 at 3:18.) - November 4, 2019: Expert discovery deadline. All expert discovery shall be completed, including depositions and any disputes relative to expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.