Matevousian

(PC) Pitts v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20191:19-cv-01029California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDGAR NELSON PITTS, 1:19-cv-01029-GSA(PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (ECF Nos. 2, 6.)

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., and

Defendant. ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT

OF INMATE FILING FEE BY U.S.

PENITENTIARY FLORENCE ADMAX 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se pursuant to 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915(a) and accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account. U.S. Penitentiary Florence ADMAX is required to send to the Clerk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.