Lozano

(HC) Carroll v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20191:19-cv-01360California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAYNE CARROLL, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01360-JLT (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

v. THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA

JARED LOZANO, et al.,

Respondents. 16 Petitioner has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which it appears he is challenging a conviction from Los Angeles County. Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis; the application has not been ruled on by this Court. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.