Sandoval

(PC) Randolph v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20191:18-cv-00968California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND

v. (ECF No. 14) C. SANDOVAL, et al.,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 7, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s original complaint, found that Plaintiff’s complaint stated a cognizable claim for excessive force against Defendants Benavides and Carrillo and a cognizable claim for retaliation against Defendant Sandoval, and directed Plaintiff to file either a first amended complaint or a written notice that he was willing to proceed only on the claims found cognizable by the Court within 30 days. (ECF No. 12.) On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion “requesting permission to supplement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.