Gastello

(HC) Robinson v. Gastello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20192:19-cv-00453California5,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENT R. ROBINSON, No. 2:19-cv-00453 KJM GGH P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS G. GASTELLO, Respondent. 16 17 Introduction and Summary Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). Petitioner brings one claim of juror misconduct in this habeas petition. However, more to the point, petitioner posits a claim that the jury, or several jurors, almost committed misconduct. “Almost” is not good enough for a winning habeas petition. Accordingly, the undersigned finds no cognizable misconduct in the first instance, and even if there were, 26 1 In the petition, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was also raised. However, by Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 11, adopted by Order, ECF No. 16, the ineffective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.