Foster

Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20191:19-cv-00987California1,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FOR

DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OPERATIONS, et al., FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

17 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on July 18, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On July 29, 2019, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was found that he had failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff’s mail was returned undeliverable, and the findings and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.