Foster
Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20191:19-cv-00987California1,239 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FLOYD FOSTER JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00987-LJO-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FOR
DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM OPERATIONS, et al., FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
17 Floyd Foster Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on July 18, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On July 29, 2019, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was found that he had failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff’s mail was returned undeliverable, and the findings and …