(PS) Rigor v. California State University Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:19-cv-00633 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 13, 2019, the court rejected plaintiff’s first amended complaint on screening, granting plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file a second amended complaint could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On September 17, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. ////…