(PC) Perrotte v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20191:15-cv-00026California9,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY P. PERROTTE, ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00026-LJO-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STACEY JOHNSON, et al., ) ) [ECF No. 180] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Jeffrey P. Perrotte is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant Stacey Johnson’s motion for summary judgment, filed May 28, 2019. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendant Stacey Johnson for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On February 6, 2017, Defendant Johnson filed an answer to the complaint. On February 7, 2017, the Court issued the discovery and scheduling order. 27 28 As previously stated, on May 28, 2019, Defendant Johnson filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.