(PS) Caldwell v. Barr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEAH CALDWELL, No. 2:19-cv-01357-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WILLIAM BARR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 26, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 6.) On August 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify Magistrate Judge and District Judge and Set Aside Order and Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 7), which is construed as Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 27 …