(SS) Jacobo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20191:17-cv-00907California2,265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

16 On September 3, 2019, counsel for Plaintiff Julissa Jacobo (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“section 406(b)”). (Doc. 19.) On September 4, 2019, the Court issued a minute order requiring Plaintiff and the Commissioner to file their responses in opposition or statements of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion, if any, by no later than September 24, 2019. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff and the Commissioner were served with copies of the motion for attorney’s fees and the minute order. (Docs. 19, 22.) On September 11, 2019, the Commissioner filed a response, acknowledging that he was not a party to the contingent- fee agreement between Plaintiff and her counsel and therefore “not in a position to either assent or object to the § 406(b) fees that Counsel seeks from Plaintiff’s past-due benefits,” but nevertheless 26 On June 17, 2019, Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on August 26, 2019). He is therefore substituted as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.