Agostini

(PC) Rodriguez v. Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20191:18-cv-01565California1,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, No. 1: 18-cv-01565-DAD-JLT Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION, VACATING ORDER

ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

AGOSTINI, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS AND JUDGMENT

ENTERED ON AUGUST 2, 2019, AND

Defendants. PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OBJECTIONS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

(Doc. No. 11)

Plaintiff Pedro Rodriguez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 29, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required. (Doc. No. 7.) The order to show cause was mailed to plaintiff’s address of record but was returned to the court by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not respond to the order to show cause within the fourteen days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.