Petersen

Petersen v. Buyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20191:19-cv-00235California4,931 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 Case No. 1:19-cv-00235-DAD-EPG

KYLE PETERSEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITH

Plaintiff, PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

v.

MEKIASH BUYARD, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO FILE THE LODGED THIRD Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 13) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

17 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action on February 19, 2019, with the filing of a Complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint on March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 8.) The Court struck the First Amended Complaint because it was not signed by Plaintiff, and instructed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint bearing his signature. (ECF No. 9.) On April 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.