Petersen
Petersen v. Buyard
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20191:19-cv-00235California4,931 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 Case No. 1:19-cv-00235-DAD-EPG
KYLE PETERSEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITH
Plaintiff, PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
v.
MEKIASH BUYARD, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO FILE THE LODGED THIRD Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 13) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
17 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action on February 19, 2019, with the filing of a Complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint on March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 8.) The Court struck the First Amended Complaint because it was not signed by Plaintiff, and instructed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint bearing his signature. (ECF No. 9.) On April 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended 24 …