Barcus

(PC) Lamarque v. Barcus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20191:18-cv-01234California2,967 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PORFIRIO LAMARQUE, Case No.: 1:18-cv-01234 DAD JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT A RESPONSE

v. (Doc. 16) JIM BARCUS, et al,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint asserting claims against employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Doc. 16.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous, malicious,” or that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.