(PS) Ortiz v. Gatestone & Co. International, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW R. ORTIZ; RENE ORTIZ, AS No. 2:18-cv-2479-JAM-EFB PS

TRUSTEE FOR ANDREW R. ORTIZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL,

INC., Defendant. 17 On August 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiffs filed a document on August 22, 2019, which has been considered by the undersigned. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United 27 …