Wofford
(PC) Windham v. Wofford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR., No. 2:18-CV-2656-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. WOFFORD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff alleges each Defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to medical treatment all relating to medical treatment of skin grafts. Plaintiff’s entire complaint is, once again, difficult to read due to illegible handwriting. Many of the claims are ambiguous and difficult to decipher. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT AND STANDARD The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof…