William J. Rumley v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20192:19-cv-02010California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM J RUMLEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04097-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

TRANSFER VENUE AND VACATING

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HEARING CALIFORNIA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.

13 Before the court is the parties’ joint motion to transfer venue. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for October 30, 2019 is VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and the deadline to oppose the motion having passed with none filed, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the motion. “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). “Before a court may transfer venue under 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.