Dwyer
(PS) Le v. Dwyer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELEN LE, No. 2:19-cv-0414 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MOLLY C DWYER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Helen Le, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, motion for emergency relief, and motion for jury trial. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8.) Plaintiff’s complaint appears to concern frustrations with various court proceedings following a vehicle accident. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will…