Dwyer

(PS) Le v. Dwyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20192:19-cv-00414California2,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELEN LE, No. 2:19-cv-0414 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MOLLY C DWYER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Helen Le, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, motion for emergency relief, and motion for jury trial. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8.) Plaintiff’s complaint appears to concern frustrations with various court proceedings following a vehicle accident. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.