(PC)Noor
(PC)Noor v. Pigniolo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAHIDULLAH QUDRETULLAH No. 2:19-CV-0180-KJM-DMC-P
NOOR,
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
L. PIGNIOLO, et al.,
15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 11). On August 16, 2019, the court issued an order addressing the sufficiency of plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF No. 13. In the screening order, the court summarized plaintiff’s allegations and claims as follows:
Plaintiff names three Defendants: L. Pigniolo, D. Adams, and an unidentified lieutenant, a.k.a the “tattooed” lieutenant. Plaintiff alleges Defendant Pigniolo violated his First Amendment rights and rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) by making unspecified racist and Islamophobic comments and statements directed at…