Mitchell v. Veterans Administration of United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20191:19-cv-00097California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HURSEL FLOYD MITCHELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00097-AWI-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

OBEY COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO PAY

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION OF FILING FEE AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

UNITED STATES,

(Doc. 8) Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Hursel Floyd Mitchell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on January 23, 2019. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). However, Plaintiff’s application was incomplete, and failed to identify the amount of monies received from various sources, the amount of cash or monies in his checking or savings accounts and the value of other property. The Court therefore directed Plaintiff to submit a completed application for consideration or pay the filing fee. (Doc. 3.) On April 11, 2019, Plaintiff submitted a second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.