Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20192:17-cv-01515California4,897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., No. 2:17-cv-01515 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GLOBAL AEROSPACE, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 This discovery dispute is back before the undersigned following review by United States District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. ECF No. 233. Defendant Global’s motion to compel, ECF No. 141, and plaintiff Aerojet’s motion to compel, ECF No. 151, were initially referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). Both motions were taken under submission without oral argument. ECF No. 180. An order resolving both motions was filed on March 13, 2019, ECF No. 189, and defendant Global sought reconsideration by the District Judge, ECF No. 197. On September 24, 2019, Judge Mueller referred a portion of Global’s motion (ECF No. 141) back to the undersigned to consider new evidence in the first instance, and referred a portion of Aerojet’s motion (ECF No. 151) for a more detailed explanation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.