McConnly

(PC) Blueford v. McConnly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20191:19-cv-00618California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVAR LESTER BLUEFORD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00618-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

DR. MCCONNLY,

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Javar Lester Blueford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s amended complaint filed on September 30, 2019 is before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 17.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.