Laurino

Laurino v. United States Postal Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20191:18-cv-00636California6,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARICELA LAURINO, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

v. ORDER

UNITED STATES, ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 9, 2019

HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY THE

Defendant. SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF No. 22) 17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendant the United States’ motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs Patricia Jurado, Manuel Jurado, Jr., and Joel Jurado (the “Jurado Plaintiffs”), have given authorization to join in this motion. (ECF No. 22 at 2.)1 Plaintiffs Maricela Laurino, Yvette Jurado, Vivian Jurado, and Irma Jurado (the “Laurino Plaintiffs”), oppose the motion. (ECF No. 25.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.