Laurino
Laurino v. United States Postal Service
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20191:18-cv-00636California6,049 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARICELA LAURINO, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00636-LJO-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING
v. ORDER
UNITED STATES, ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 9, 2019
HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY THE
Defendant. SCHEDULING ORDER
(ECF No. 22) 17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendant the United States’ motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs Patricia Jurado, Manuel Jurado, Jr., and Joel Jurado (the “Jurado Plaintiffs”), have given authorization to join in this motion. (ECF No. 22 at 2.)1 Plaintiffs Maricela Laurino, Yvette Jurado, Vivian Jurado, and Irma Jurado (the “Laurino Plaintiffs”), oppose the motion. (ECF No. 25.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the 26…