Seitz
(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No.: 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CASE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
B. SEITZ, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
THE COURT’S ORDER
Defendants. (Docs. 14, 18)
21-DAY DEADLINE
18 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2019, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims in his first amended complaint, and granting Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint within 21 days. (Doc. 18.) Although more than 21 days have passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or to otherwise respond to the Court’s screening order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court…